Would Africa ever become a world economic power?

A review of the historical antecedents of world economic power indicates the specific times that a number of nations (usually Western) had influenced the world through economic means, dating back to the 13th Century.

In most cases in the past, economic power was preceded by military sovereignty which brought in its wave marked economic prosperity in countries such as The Netherlands, Germany, Britain, France, and Russia.

The primary compositions in all economic power status were the country’s industrial base, natural resources, technology, geographic position, health, and education systems. Since the end of World War II, the US has dominated the world, both economically and militarily. Today, the reins of world economic power are however shifting hands as a consequence of globalization with Brazil, Russia, India and China usually called by the acronym BRICs), seen as the largest emerging economies. Experts say the speed of change and technological innovation taking place particularly in China is breathtaking and is creating a new reality; a reality that is unprecedented and which economists say will leapfrog China as the biggest economy in the world in as little as 20 years time.

The term shift inherently implies variation in space and over time. The puzzle therefore is, why has the wind of change eluded sub-Saharan Africa and is there any shred of evidence to suggest that it is coming soon? Obviously, there are a thousand and one reasons why a greater number of people will see this as wishful thinking.  But perhaps, this solid stance might be softened if one considers the facts of history particularly the case of the much touted China.

In 1949, China was one of the poorest and most underdeveloped countries in the world with about 90% of the population living in the countryside and most of them living in poverty as it was in sub-Saharan Africa.

Up to the 1960s, the economy of China was dominated by agricultural activities and the only difference from that of sub-Saharan Africa was the color of the skin of the respective populations. The turning point in China’s history towards industrialization started in 1978 with reforms which created high incentives for farmers, and greater effort to open up the economy to foreign direct investment. Subsequently, there was a change to allow freer price movement which consequently led to China becoming the ‘world factory’ with a growth rate of 10% per annum for the past 25 years.

In contrast, within the same spate of time, the economic performance of sub-Saharan African countries worsened as indicated by lower economic growth rates, greater instability of exchange rate, lower exports and increased reliance on foreign aid. Indeed, it has been estimated that for the past 50 years, more than $1 trillion in development-related aid has been transferred from rich countries to Africa and yet no significant development has been realized. Whether it is economic, human development, corruption perception, or doing business around the world index, sub-Saharan Africa countries consistently fall short of preferred limits.

Attempts by the World Bank and IMF to promote policies by means of structural adjustment designed to restructure African economies in order to improve their performance in the increasingly competitive world economy, did little to reverse the situation in the 1980s. Meanwhile, China had continued its vigorous development policies, and from 2007 till date, it accounts for as much of global economic growth as the G7 leading industrial countries combined. Sub-Saharan Africa cannot even boast of 5% of global trade and most population growth rates exceed the growth in economy.

The main driving factors for China’s economy are the astronomical rates of savings (approximately 37.5% of annual income), investment, and exports. Even though, there are serious issues such as inflation and concerns of overheating of the economy, there is no doubt that the standard of living generally has improved for the Chinese citizenry.

At the continental level, the picture doesn’t seem to be positive on Africa ever becoming a world stage of economic activity. In fact, the 7 % growth rate which is necessary to move countries out of poverty looks more of a mirage than a reality in many instances. With the current average growth rate of 3% in many sub-Saharan African countries, it is unlikely that extreme poverty will be eliminated soon and much less likely that the continent will become a world economic super power.

That notwithstanding, all hopes cannot be lost of ever realizing the goal of controlling the economic welfare of the world. As a matter of fact, in some academic studies, South Africa has been labeled as one of the emerging economies of the world. Other candidates of high performance are Botswana, Rwanda, and Ghana. In 2009, the World Bank survey ranked Rwanda as the number one favorable destination for doing business in Africa. The case of Rwanda is phenomenal given that it had to start at scratch after the genocide to rebuild a whole nation without reliance on aid.

On the other hand, in spite of the fact that Nigeria and Egypt have relatively large economies, living standards in those countries do not reflect their sizes.

The economy of Ghana is making great strides in attaining the millennium development goals and stabilizing the economy, consequence of past and present policies that various governments have adopted since 1992 that sought to increase food production through the modernization of agriculture. Surely, the snail-paced growth of agriculture over the years is not in any way comparable to the huge success in China’s situation. Nevertheless, having the right footing as the Chinese did is by any means relevant to charting a prosperous future, at least on theoretical basis.

Even at this stage, there is some level of worldwide recognition of the significant strides Ghana has chalked. No wonder the former president, John Kufour, was recently awarded a prize for his role in cutting in half the proportion of Ghanaians living in hunger and under one dollar a day – making Ghana the first sub-Saharan African country to have reached that point. Also, Ghana is the first sub-Saharan African country to be declared a middle income country in recent times.

The problems confronting sub-Sahara African countries cut across broad perspectives and in every facet of life: social, political, environmental, economic, and geographic. Therefore, no single solution can ever be the blueprint to help the continent take its turn as a world vanguard. The list of solutions is limitless and sometimes conflicting. One thing however is clear; Africa will have to first, be self sustaining in food production and possibly export in huge volumes finished products to command the necessary foreign exchange.

A modernization of agriculture to avoid dependence on the benevolence of nature will be a big leap to achieving this. This simple principle has worked in all cases of development. Fortunately, African countries are blessed with large arable land and do not have to face the types of difficulties that Japan and South Korea have to deal with.  Let Sub-Saharan Africa feed its population and all others will be added onto it.

By Jude Kyoore

Email: [email protected]

World economic power: Where is Africa?

A review of the historical antecedents of world economic power indicates the specific times that a number of nations (usually Western) had influenced the world through economic means, dating back to the 13th Century.
In most cases in the past, economic power was preceded by military sovereignty which brought in its wave marked economic prosperity in countries such as The Netherlands, Germany, Britain, France, and Russia.
The primary compositions in all economic power status were the country’s industrial base, natural resources, technology, geographic position, health, and education systems. Since the end of World War II, the US has dominated the world, both economically and militarily. Today, the reins of world economic power are however shifting hands as a consequence of globalization with Brazil, Russia, India and China usually called by the acronym BRICs), seen as the largest emerging economies. Experts say the speed of change and technological innovation taking place particularly in China is breathtaking and is creating a new reality; a reality that is unprecedented and which economists say will leapfrog China as the biggest economy in the world in as little as 20 years time.
The term shift inherently implies variation in space and over time. The puzzle therefore is, why has the wind of change eluded sub-Saharan Africa and is there any shred of evidence to suggest that it is coming soon? Obviously, there are a thousand and one reasons why a greater number of people will see this as wishful thinking.  But perhaps, this solid stance might be softened if one considers the facts of history particularly the case of the much touted China.

In 1949, China was one of the poorest and most underdeveloped countries in the world with about 90% of the population living in the countryside and most of them living in poverty as it was in sub-Saharan Africa.
Up to the 1960s, the economy of China was dominated by agricultural activities and the only difference from that of sub-Saharan Africa was the color of the skin of the respective populations. The turning point in China’s history towards industrialization started in 1978 with reforms which created high incentives for farmers, and greater effort to open up the economy to foreign direct investment. Subsequently, there was a change to allow freer price movement which consequently led to China becoming the ‘world factory’ with a growth rate of 10% per annum for the past 25 years.
In contrast, within the same spate of time, the economic performance of sub-Saharan African countries worsened as indicated by lower economic growth rates, greater instability of exchange rate, lower exports and increased reliance on foreign aid. Indeed, it has been estimated that for the past 50 years, more than $1 trillion in development-related aid has been transferred from rich countries to Africa and yet no significant development has been realized. Whether it is economic, human development, corruption perception, or doing business around the world index, sub-Saharan Africa countries consistently fall short of preferred limits.
Attempts by the World Bank and IMF to promote policies by means of structural adjustment designed to restructure African economies in order to improve their performance in the increasingly competitive world economy, did little to reverse the situation in the 1980s. Meanwhile, China had continued its vigorous development policies, and from 2007 till date, it accounts for as much of global economic growth as the G7 leading industrial countries combined. Sub-Saharan Africa cannot even boast of 5% of global trade and most population growth rates exceed the growth in economy.
The main driving factors for China’s economy are the astronomical rates of savings (approximately 37.5% of annual income), investment, and exports. Even though, there are serious issues such as inflation and concerns of overheating of the economy, there is no doubt that the standard of living generally has improved for the Chinese citizenry.
At the continental level, the picture doesn’t seem to be positive on Africa ever becoming a world stage of economic activity. In fact, the 7 % growth rate which is necessary to move countries out of poverty looks more of a mirage than a reality in many instances. With the current average growth rate of 3% in many sub-Saharan African countries, it is unlikely that extreme poverty will be eliminated soon and much less likely that the continent will become a world economic super power.

That notwithstanding, all hopes cannot be lost of ever realizing the goal of controlling the economic welfare of the world. As a matter of fact, in some academic studies, South Africa has been labeled as one of the emerging economies of the world. Other candidates of high performance are Botswana, Rwanda, and Ghana. In 2009, the World Bank survey ranked Rwanda as the number one favorable destination for doing business in Africa. The case of Rwanda is phenomenal given that it had to start at scratch after the genocide to rebuild a whole nation without reliance on aid.

On the other hand, in spite of the fact that Nigeria and Egypt have relatively large economies, living standards in those countries do not reflect their sizes.
The economy of Ghana is making great strides in attaining the millennium development goals and stabilizing the economy, consequence of past and present policies that various governments have adopted since 1992 that sought to increase food production through the modernization of agriculture. Surely, the snail-paced growth of agriculture over the years is not in any way comparable to the huge success in China’s situation. Nevertheless, having the right footing as the Chinese did is by any means relevant to charting a prosperous future, at least on theoretical basis.
Even at this stage, there is some level of worldwide recognition of the significant strides Ghana has chalked. No wonder the former president, John Kufour, was recently awarded a prize for his role in cutting in half the proportion of Ghanaians living in hunger and under one dollar a day – making Ghana the first sub-Saharan African country to have reached that point. Also, Ghana is the first sub-Saharan African country to be declared a middle income country in recent times.
The problems confronting sub-Sahara African countries cut across broad perspectives and in every facet of life: social, political, environmental, economic, and geographic. Therefore, no single solution can ever be the blueprint to help the continent take its turn as a world vanguard. The list of solutions is limitless and sometimes conflicting. One thing however is clear; Africa will have to first, be self sustaining in food production and possibly export in huge volumes finished products to command the necessary foreign exchange.
A modernization of agriculture to avoid dependence on the benevolence of nature will be a big leap to achieving this. This simple principle has worked in all cases of development. Fortunately, African countries are blessed with large arable land and do not have to face the types of difficulties that Japan and South Korea have to deal with.  Let Sub-Saharan Africa feed its population and all others will be added onto it.
By Jude Kyoore
Email: [email protected]

1 Comment
  1. TT says

    Unless Ghana and Africa have leaders weed out corrupt, greed, visionless among them. Improves Agriculture as well as becomes net exportor, industrialised, Mechanized Agriculture, improves Agrobusiness, Education-Human resources, ICT.
    All this can be achieved in a displine manner.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Shares